by Heather Smith on February 7th, 2010, 10:54 pm
I know so very little about the grave and it's findings. I also realize that not only is it from the wrong area of Europe for me but about 400 years later than my persona. But then, I have also invested myself into the Huldremose (2nd Century BC) and the Gaul and Wife statute in the National Museum, Rome (230-200 BC) ad as other examples of 'bog dresses'. Honestly, if I was to try to shoot for Scotland, 100AD there is no telling what I might have worn as little to nothing has survived. I am a little confused with the linen comment. Was the dress linen? On my link it appears to be a fine woven wool even though the wool looks a little too white to me, but the fiber content appears a little too fuzzy for linen. If in fact it was wool, wool survives under such conditions much better than linen which might explain why they were able to suggest that it was a bog dress. I do not know how much of the fabric survived. In all honesty this is closer to 'Celtic' than say Viking in my opinion and as little of womens' garments survive the historical context I still would rather research this grave find than something else of much later of date. I actually am more interested in the glass beads which have their Celtic counterparts on the mainland and Isles dating back to the Bronze age. I love the fact they are used as a belt, which is unique. This is why I would like to know more, but felt some folks might be interested in the find or know something more about it.
"A whole troop of foreigners would not be able to withstand a single Gual if he called his wife to his assistance" -Ammianus Marcellinus